"E.L. Willighagen" wrote: > > I also packaged Norm's DocBook Slides DTD and named it docbook-slides. > > i see that you're working hard on packaging everything,
Not really, I packaged this stuff a while ago because we use it. Now I'm slowly improving the packages so that they can eventually make it into debian. They are missing some important things (e.g. changelog.Debian), but I view this as a chance to see if anyone cares to use them, test them, send bugs, etc.. They work fine, and I don't have the time right now to figure out some of the more technical aspects of the packaging system. But if there's sufficient interest I'll do what I can to address the debian-specific minutiae. I applied for maintainership, but I have a feeling the process will take a long time. IMHO, Debian would really benefit from a collection of DocBook XML publishing tools that (1) are up-to-date, (2) make it easy* to create valid documents, and (3) make publishing easy, as well. (*for a user at the level of, say, xemacs. I know this is possible because we've easily trained a number of non-technical student employees who quickly became productive. ) > but do the include > documentation as well? They include everything in Norm's distribution packages. Sometimes I even write a lame page on how to make the stuff work. When appropriate, the packages also have doc-base entries. They show up in both dhelp and dwww menus. > where did you find it? At the docbook shopper's paradise: http://nwalsh.com > is it GPL or FDL? I dunno. Norm's copyright applies to his stuff. But I haven't bothered licensing my mini-docs yet. FDL, would be the choice. I'll eventually get there. Thanks for your feedback. Mark > > > Egon > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
