Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And I found that sgmltools-lite does not work with openjade well. [...] > I used http://nis-www.lanl.gov/~rosalia/mydocs/docbook-intro.sgml, > and "sgmltools -b html docbook-intro.sgml" works well when jadewhich > uses "/usr/bin/jade". > > And, with all the same setup except the change in jadewhich to use > "/usr/bin/openjade", "sgmltools -v -b html docbook-intro.sgml" did > very time-consuming task silently
Yes, it's wide characters and very much slower. > and ended with the error message: > > /usr/bin/openjade:/usr/lib/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/docbook/nwalsh/html/dblink.dsl: > 406:5:E: undeclared use of feature "simple-page" Hmm. Sounds like either openjade's problem or docbook-stylesheets (probably the latter). Can you file a bug against the latter? If possible, please give the complete openjade cmdline and link to where I can get SGML or XML sources. > Are there anyone who can let me know why openjade can't process sgml source > just as same as jade does ? Is openjade not compatible with jade ? It is. Maybe it's being more militant. > BTW, I still wish to have a dummy package as sgmltools-2 to smooth > migration from sgmltools-2 to sgmltools-lite. I will upload a dummy > package for sgml-tools (v1) since some maintainer requested me to do > so, and I would do it for sgmltools-2 unless you really hate it. Ah, no, please do so. See my last email. I will not bother uploading sgmltools-2 bugfix -- just kill it. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
