Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > / Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | ** R003 Possible Bug > | > | In <URL:http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/gLSB/gLSB/sgmlr003.html>, they > | recommend the distributed catalogs be named such as: > | /usr/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl-stylesheets-1.54/catalog > | > | Norm has pointed out that jade / openjade will be *forced* to use that > | when it uses *any* of the files in that directory. > | > | Is this a known plus or a bug? We're going to need to try it out and > | find out. Seems like a bug to me. > > It's a feature. See issue B of 9401: > http://www.oasis-open.org/html/tr9401.html
Well, my question is whether it's a bug in the LSB spec to be suggesting that delegated catalogs be named 'catalog', and sitting in the directory with the DTDs and such. Seems like a dangerous way to unintentionally include catalogs which might be otherwise disabled. It effectively removes control from the centralized and super catalogs. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
