James LewisMoss writes: > >>>>> On 18 Mar 2001 17:21:28 -0500, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Adam> I'm wondering if we should version the major releases of stuff > Adam> like docbook-xml and docbook. For instance, should we have one > Adam> docbook package with 2.4.1, 3.0, 3.1 and 4.1, as we do now, or > Adam> should we perhaps break that up into docbook-2, docbook-3.0, > Adam> docbook-3.1, docbook-4.1 ? > > Adam> Thoughts? > > It's not a lot of stuff. I'd just keep it all in one package.
OTOH, new releases might be packaged more quickly if they get their own packages. And that would be a good thing. my $0.02, Mark > > Jim > > -- > @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! > @ http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl! > @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _____________________________________ Mark Johnson Senior Lecturing Fellow 111 Physics Bldg., Box 90305 Department of Physics Duke University Durham, NC 27708-0305 (919) 660-2504 Fax: (919) 660-2525
