Adam Di Carlo writes: > Package: docbook-xml-website > Version: 1.9-1 > Severity: wishlist > > I'm wondering why you bother splitting off docbook-website-stylesheets > as a separate package and not just ship with docbook-xml-website? The > source comes together... > > If there's a good reason to do this, just close this bug.
I split off the stylesheets so one could install the website dtd w/o needing to install the full docbook-xsl-stylesheets. Logically, they're independent. Same goes for the docbook slides package. However, it's requires more packaging work to split these packages and I'm not sure it's worth the effort. Does anybody (on debian-sgml) have an opinion one way or another? Since I'll be repackaging all this stuff (as well as the docbook-xsl-stylesheets) for the /usr/share/sgml layout this weekend, I'll need to decide which path to follow. Whichever method is used, I'll make note of it in the LSB implementation summary, still in draft form: http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/debian/sgml/lsb-on-debian.html/index.html BTW, I'm inclined to keep the upstream structure and ditch the splitting off of the stylesheets. Thanks for the feedback. Mark > -- System Information > Debian Release: testing/unstable > Architecture: sparc > Kernel: Linux arroz 2.2.18pre21 #1 Wed Nov 22 17:12:06 EST 2000 sparc64 > > Versions of packages docbook-xml-website depends on: > ii docbook-xml 4.1.2-4 XML DTD for DocBook, also known > as >
