On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:42:45 -0500 Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can try the patch if you still feel it'll help - but it does look > like SA was at fault in this particular case. Just knowing it is SA is insufficient information, we need to know what inside of the kernel, as part of whatever SA is doing, asks for such a large allocation. Please apply the patch and obtain the debugging information, as I have asked you to. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
