On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:07:34 +0200 Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've added a debug statement in this code, which gives the following output: > Apr 19 20:39:22 localhost kernel: rtc_init: ebus auxio > Apr 19 20:39:22 localhost kernel: rtc_init: ebus power > Apr 19 20:39:22 localhost kernel: rtc_init: ebus SUNW,pll > Apr 19 20:39:22 localhost kernel: rtc_init: ebus se > Apr 19 20:39:22 localhost kernel: rtc_init: ebus su > Apr 19 20:39:22 localhost kernel: rtc_init: ebus su > Apr 19 20:39:22 localhost kernel: rtc_init: ebus ecpp > Apr 19 20:39:22 localhost kernel: rtc_init: ebus fdthree > Apr 19 20:39:22 localhost kernel: rtc_init: ebus eeprom > Apr 19 20:39:22 localhost kernel: rtc_init: ebus flashprom > Apr 19 20:39:22 localhost kernel: rtc_init: ebus SUNW,CS4231 > Apr 19 20:39:22 localhost kernel: rtc_init: no PC rtc found > > So, apparently __sparc__ is defined for my U10. I also added a similar > statement in the isa bus scan, so __sparc_v9__ is not set. > > Any ideas where the RTC could be hiding? __sparc_v9__ should be set when compiling 64-bit code... Can you add a "#error OK it is set" or something right under the "#ifdef __sparc_v9__" to make sure? If you added debugging to the ISA loop and it didn't print out, this just means that your box lacks that bus type. Anyways, "/usr/sbin/prtconf -pv" output would shed more light on this problem. Thanks for your debugging so far. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
