That rant was absolutely hilarious!
--- Andrew Hicox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that BIND is a beast, and using it in this manner is
> like trying to swat a fly with an ICBM. It's using a lot of CPU, and
> it's a pain in the butt to configure. On top of that, and what's
> really
> prompted my to investigate BIND alternatives, is that named just goes
>
> absolutely nuts when it can't find a root server, and that happens
> from
> time to time from my DSL line. When it can't talk to a root server,
> named goes all cornolio and logs that fact like crazy, soaks the CPU
> on
> the machine and fills up /var in like 20 minutes flat. (this in spite
>
> of having category lame-servers { null; }; in named.conf)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
