Uhgh. I realize your time is limited (I know mine is, and I'm sure I'm not the only one - heh). I guess I was a little annoyed at you not responding to my previous posts...
In any case, I'm happy that at least *someone* is aware of the problem, along with having a setup that currently works. I'll hold out hope that it'll be fixed eventually (if it isn't already?). I'm not surprised that this wouldn't be the top thing on your to-do list. Thank you, David. Even if you haven't managed to resolve the issue, you did manage to narrow it down. Good luck. On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:13:32PM -0700, David S. Miller said: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 11:13:21 -0400 > Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've abandoned the Debian 2.4 kernels in favor of vanilla 2.4.30, and > > this problem has yet to crop up. > > > > 11:03:06 up 9 days, 18:42, 13 users, load average: 0.47, 0.17, 0.14 > > > > Working on 10 days uptime, and no complaints. The SMTP server has yet > > to stop responding, too. > > This doesn't surprise me at all. > > > Instead of ignoring the issue, can you please look into it? > > I'm glad that you think you can allocate my time and my priorities > however you wish, but sadly this is not the case. > > I currently have more pressing matters, as networking maintainer, and > simply have zero time to look into any sparc issues lately. > > Sorry. -- Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> System Administrator Psychology Department, Rutgers University, Newark campus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
