I forgot to cross-post this mail to debian sparc list (I've only sent it to debian devel list but it's also related to sparc, so here it is). --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello, I'm ready to release an experimental glibc-2 package for Debian/SPARC based on development snapshots, not 2.0 sources from Debian. I built a full package (sources + binaries). I named it libc6 but tagged it by a release number that include date (2.0.90-970629-1) to be able to release new snapshots that don't upgrade library revision number. I hope this is the right way. First upload of an unstable package have to be done to experimental, right? However, this package is required to start to port other packages to libc6, so I'd rather like an upload to unstable. Can you agree? Thanks in advance. PS: I compiled pgp for sparc and generated a 1024-bit key but I don't know how to register it to Debian upload system to be able to sign my uploads. Do you have any pointers? -- Eric Delaunay | "La guerre justifie l'existence des militaires. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | En les supprimant." Henri Jeanson (1900-1970) -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
