--On Wed, Nov 25, 1998 10:08 pm +0100 "Eric Delaunay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About kernel, I will release the next bootdisks with 2.0.35. Is it enough > reliable for *all* sparc workstations, or should I switch to 2.1 ? The only serious problems I had when I used 2.0.35 were: Buggered signal handling (fixed in glibc?) Miscellaneous X/VC messes (possibly partly the signal-handling problem?) ldd segfaults (only on sun4c machines, fixed in 2.1) Since the last breaks dpkg-shlibdeps, I'm using 2.1 ATM. But it does have some rather serious X problems on cgsixes (?) Jules /----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\ | Jelibean aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6 Evelyn Rd | | Jules aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Richmond, Surrey | | Julian Bean | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TW9 2TF *UK* | +----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+ | Debian GNU/Linux - "Microsoft *does* have a year 2000 problem - | | and we're it!" (paraphrased from IRC) | \----------------------------------------------------------------------/
