On Mon, Mar 22, 1999 at 09:34:41PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > Ok, I've gotten glibc 2.1.1-0.1 compiled. No real problems (atleast no > C++ libs problems like i386 is having). > > Only thing I see wrong is tar broke: > > tar: error in loading shared libraries: tar: symbol chown, version > GLIBC_2.1 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference > > GLIBC_2.1 is defined (atleast it shows when I grep strings libc.so.6) > in libc. > > The `chown' comand works fine, however, and nothing else seems to be > affected. Could this be a bad compile of tar or was the previous glibc > 2.1pre's compiled with some strange symbols?
Just a note, I really need to reboot before I strike these as persistent problems, but since I wasn't able to restart sshd or reboot the system before my dial-up droped me, I will have to wait till tomorrow morning when I go into work. -- ----- -- - -------- --------- ---- ------- ----- - - --- -------- Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux OpenLDAP Core - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] UnixGroup Admin - Jordan Systems The Choice of the GNU Generation ------ -- ----- - - ------- ------- -- ---- - -------- - --- ---- - --
