Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wouldn't call glibc 2.1.1 woefully out of date. On the other hand, the > glibc 2.1.2pre3 (notice the pre) which is still in prerelease, has a > possibly broken mmap(), which is why it isn't compiled for sparc yet in > potato. >
maybe not woefully out of date, but something is wrong with it (2.1.1 that is). > I am looking into the mmap problem. Until then, I suggest not using glibc > 2.1.2pre2 unless you really feal like testing prerelease software. > i am already testing prerelease software on intel (and alpha, and powerpc) so what's one more platform. i can't say i didn't have some emotions installing it though. but as an added bonus i get the xserver to work again. so, is anybody looking into the linker problem? --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |
