Dave Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Why not use MULE 4 (Emacs 20.5)? I did development work for it on >SPARC Potato.
Problem is it doesn't support wnn... only skk which, ahem..%sucks%.. >I also built Mule 2.3 on it without much trouble a while ago for >research purposes using the patch to 19.34 from ETL, but the current >Emacs should be much better overall. Could you tell me a bit more about this ? I checked etlport.etl.go.jp and dld the patched package. But there is no configuration for sparc-linux. Haven't had time yet to look more into it, so any advice appreciated. Tnx -- Give me debian or pencil and paper
