Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 03:09:08PM +0200, Andreas Larsson wrote: > > Heh, well that explains it. It identifies as: > > vendor string: The XFree86 Project, Inc > > when i run xdpyinfo, isnt that a little bit odd? > > That's strange, but it doesn't mean you secretly have an XFree86 server. I > imagine some header file defining that string got included. I know those > Xsun* servers aren't from XFree86, though, because the original code base > predates the XFree86 organization, and because XFree86 3.x doesn't actually > ship those servers in the state we do. We have some massive patches that > get us the servers we actually ship. >
Ok, that explains it. > > > XFree86 4.0.1 has drivers for at least some of the hardware supported by > > > the old Xsun* servers. > > > > Ok, i better check out if my creator card is suported then. > > I believe they are. My Ultra has only an ATI Rage Pro, however, so I'm > stuck until Marc La France gets the support finished. > well, i guess i have to try XFree 4 then.. > > > > ok, its running 1152x900, the acctual resolution on the screen however > > is still 1600x1200. > > That's really odd. Are you sure? Is the display "picture framed", set in > the upper-left-hand corner with large areas of nothing on the right and > bottom edges? > nope the display is perfectly normal, im not sure that its acctualy 1600x1200 but my screen says its running at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and thats pretty high. it doesnt change even in console, its still 71.1khz. thanks for all your efforts /Andreas
