On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, m.nine.six wrote:
> > > > mv vmlinuz vmlinux-elf.gz > > gzip -d vmlinux-elf.gz > > elf2out -o vmlinux vmlinux-elf > > thanks a lot. > finally i heared that i have to do it this way. really tricky... > > now finally it boots but it can't find the nfs server. it get's me the > following error: > > Looking up port of RPC 100002/2 on 192.168.10.1 > RPC: sendmsg returned error 51 > RPC: sendmsg returned error 51 > RPC: sendmsg returned error 51 > RPC: sendmsg returned error 51 > portmap: server 192.168.10.1 not responding, timed out > Root-NFS: unable to get nfsd port number from server using default > Looking up port of RPC 100005/1 on 192.168.10.1 > RPC: sendmsg returned error 51 > RPC: sendmsg returned error 51 > RPC: sendmsg returned error 51 > RPC: sendmsg returned error 51 > portmap: server 192.168.10.1 not responding, timed out > Root-NFS: unable to get nfsd port number from server using default > RPC: sendmsg returned error 51 > RPC: sendmsg returned error 51 > RPC: sendmsg returned error 51 > RPC: sendmsg returned error 51 > mount: server 192.168.10.1 not responding, timed out > Root-NFS: Server returned error -5 while mounting /sun4m > > > the boot parameter is: "boot net nfsroot=192.168.10.1:/sun4m" > > and if i do without the boot parameter it writes the following error: > > Root-NFS: No NFS server avaible, giving up. > VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy. > > the portmap is running: > program vers proto port > 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper > 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper > 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs > 100005 1 udp 1039 mountd > 100005 1 tcp 1066 mountd > 100005 2 udp 1039 mountd > 100005 2 tcp 1066 mountd > 100005 3 udp 1039 mountd > 100005 3 tcp 1066 mountd > Hmm, Could your try this, use $ pmap_dump>filename then edit it and change 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs to read 100002 2 udp 2049 nfs you may also wish to add the line 100002 2 tcp 2049 nfs then $ /etc/init.d/portmap restart and $ pmap_set<filename Then try again. Best Regards, Peter Firmstone. > as it should till the mountd. shouldn't it run below the port 1024? if > so how can i put it back to the right port? but on the other side i can > mount this nfs part. from a 3th box. that means nfs works correct. or > not? > > > to install a sun box is much more complicated then i ever imagined it. > and i always drive to a dead end... > > > > ps: i still tried to link to silo and it doesn't worked as expected. > silo starts but is not able to start any kernel images. > > > thanks a lot for your help, > > regards, > alias m.nine.six. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
