On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 05:27:34PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (christian mock) writes: > > > I'll build my local version now, but could you escalate this to > > either the dump maintainer or somebody responsible for the sparc > > build process, or whatever are the right steps? > > I maintain dump too. :-) From the upstream changelog: > > Changes between versions 0.4b10 and 0.4b11 (released December 5, 1999) > ====================================================================== > > 2. Added a 'S' option to dump which determines the amount of space > that is needed to perform the dump without actually doing it, similar > to the Sun's ufsdump 'S' option. Patch contributed by Rob Cermak > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > I suppose this means that I could/should add a versioned build dependency > on dump, but as that's a fairly old version, I suspect the auto-builds of > the new amanda I just uploaded will fix it since the sparc buildd is using > a chroot'ed build environment now, and is likely to satisfy the amanda build > dependency with a current version of dump at build time. > > I'll CC the debian-sparc list, in the hopes that someone involved with the > buildd for sparc will take a second to make sure sparc isn't relying on some > ancient version of dump I don't want to know about... :-)
Should be fine :) -- -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------ / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
