Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 04:40:51PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is the 2.4.4 kernel in testing at all? If not, could it be uploaded > > with urgency HIGH to get it into testing? > > Absolutely. It was worth upgrading auric to 2.4.x because of the > stability issues. No, neither the 2.2.19 images, nor the 2.4.4 images > are in testing. The 2.2.19 image needs one bug fix. The 2.4.4 images > were 9 days old, now they are 1 day old again...so time is the only > issue.
Well, the time is shorter when you set the urgency in the changelog when uploading... > I'll get new 2.2.19 images uploaded tonight. Excellent. > > > You'll notice that the sun4u rescue image is 2880k. I know that sparc's > > > don't have 2880k floppies, but then again, most ultrasparc's that I have > > > used can't boot from floppy anyway. You'll need to netboot with the > > > provided tftp image, unless you know how to create a bootable CD with > > > the provided files (isn't too hard). > > > > So you're completely dropping 1440k floppies? > > Read that, dropping 1440k floppy support for sun4u (not sparc32 like > sun4c, sun4m, sun4d). It's not like the support was used much anyway. > The 2.4.4 sun4u images wont fit on a 1440k image, so I have no choice. Ok. > > BTW, my only woody box is a SPARC, so I've been doing the > > boot-floppies source/binary builds on that. > > Yeah. That's why I'm just worrying about sun4u, since I can test those. > Let me know if there are any oddities with sparc32 boot. My box is a Sun4u as well. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
