On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 06:39:26PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote: > Back when 2.4.18 came out, I heard there was a problem where a patch > vital to Sparc didn't make it it. At the time I wasn't worried about > it since I didn't need to go to 2.4.18. Now looking at changelogs > for 2.4.19-pre1, I see mention of one change labeled SPARC64, but > nothing for SPARC in general. Does this mean that 2.4.18 works fine > for Sparc 32? Or did 2.4.19-pre1 not yet fix that problem? Or was > the change mislabeled? > > Is 2.4.19-pre9 now as stable for Sparc/Sparc64 as it is for x86? > Is there a web page/site that gives Sparc specific information about > the kernel?
I would have to say 2.4.19-pre9 is the stablest (is that a word? :-) stock 2.4 kernel available on the net for sparc32. Of course, I suspect there are some hacks floating around people's trees, but those'll get merged in eventually. Regards, Rob Radez -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
