Hi, > However, I think Dave is making it a point to get gcc-3.2 able to build > kernels.
I compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with gcc-3.2.1 on my Blade 100 and it seems to work fine for the moment. Olivier Hochreutiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Message d'origine----- De : Ben Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi, 3. octobre 2002 03:01 À : Roy Bixler Cc : David S. Miller; [email protected]; [email protected] Objet : Re: 2.5.40 on Sunblade 100 (was Re: NCPFS, anyone?) > I thought GCC 3.1 and above are OK for compiling kernels on > Ultrasparc. I also thought the IDE drivers were from the 2.4 series > and should be stable. Will I have to eat my words there too? egcs64 has always been the suggested way to compile kernels from ultrasparc. Nothing else has ever been suggested or supported up to this point. However, I think Dave is making it a point to get gcc-3.2 able to build kernels. As for 2.5.40 on Blade100, I just got a kernel built on mine, and I'm about to reboot myself. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
