On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:35:21AM +0200, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 21:52:17 -0400, > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > Because kernel 2.4.x is not stable on sun4cdm yet. You've noted that > > already :) > > actually, 2.4.19 was behaving quite well on my SS20 (even in SMP mode) > and LX. i'm running the dual-SS20 as my two-headed desktop, and it works > better with 2.4 than with 2.2 (there were issues with the mouse that the > kernel-upgrade solved). and the 2.4.20-pre11 image from rob seems to have > fixed the last outstanding annoyance (problems with swap on SMP kernels). > as far as i can tell from my desktop and firewall, 2.4.current on sun4cdm > is no worse than on i386. > > could we please start to reevaluate the '2.4 is bad for sun4cdm' mantra > and actually give 2.4 a chance?
I can support this, I have been running 2.4.19 sun4m SMP (SS20, dual) and 2.4.20-preXX with various results, the 2.4.20-pre11smp that I use off of Rob's site works fine as far as I can tell. Sure, it has bugs, what piece of source code does not... Cheers, /ChJ
