On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:07, Roy Bixler wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:40:20PM -0400, Robert C. Mosher II wrote: > > I have been trying to compile a kernel to be used on several Ultra 5s in > > my schools computer science lab. One of the main reasons I need to > > recompile the kernel is so that smbfs will be supported. Although the > > kernel compiles and is usable, smbfs is not supported: > > > > ERROR: smbfs filesystem not supported by the kernel > > Please refer to the smbmnt(8) manual page > > smbmnt failed: 255 > > When you do 'lsmod', do you see something like the following? > > Module Size Used by Not tainted > smbfs 39376 1 (autoclean) >
Running 'lsmod' only gives me the headings. There are no modules listed. > Also, do you have the 'smbfs' package installed? > > $ dpkg --list smbfs I get the exact same output. > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > uppercase=bad) > ||/ Name Version Description > +++-==============-==============-============================================ > ii smbfs 3.0.0beta1-1 mount and umount commands for the smbfs (for > > -- > Roy Bixler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The University of Chicago Press
