> Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:09:24 -0400 > From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Antonello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected] > Content-Disposition: inline > Sender: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Spam-Level: > Resent-From: [email protected] > X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/12767 > X-Loop: [email protected] > Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20 > X-Spam-Level: > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:15:50PM +0100, Dave Love wrote: > > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Bitten by the 64-bitness default of gcc. > > > > Why does it have a surprising default now? > > If you uninstall libc6-sparc64, it will be the same as it used to be. > Now, it checks "uname=sparc64 && -f /usr/lib64/libc.so", and it defaults > to -m64, otherwise it defaults to -m32. >
I thought it was going to decide based on libgcc.a instead of libc.so? James A. Morrison
