On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, David S. Miller wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:53:34 -0400 > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:42:59AM -0500, Kent West wrote: > > > Kent West wrote: > > > > > > Another example: running "glxgears" only shows a frame rate of 26 to 44 > > > FPS. > > > > GL isn't a good comparison, since it relies on video hardware, not the > > CPU (unless of course you are running it as software-GL). > > If you have a creator3d card (and DRI is properly enabled both in > your kernel and your xfree86 configuration) glxgears should give you > a few hundred frames per second easily.
BTW, what is the difference between DRI and the drm.o kernel module? I have the drm.o kernel module loaded and the 'Load "dri"' line commented, and I can get about 470 fps. Without the drm.o module, the numbers are much lower, but above 100 fps. I don't remember having tested other configurations. -- Erwann ABALEA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - RSA PGP Key ID: 0x2D0EABD5 ----- JL> C'est moi ou Julien II qui te dois une bière ? JB> C'est moi qui lui dois une mousse. FF> L'autre aussi, ya pas de raison. -+- FF in <http://neuneu.mine.nu> : Y'en aura pour tout le monde -+-
