On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 16:03, Kent West wrote: > What's the best way to clone a SCSI drive in a Sunblade 1000 running > Debian to another SB1000?
I'm going to assume that all of the partitions on this drive are Linux ones, that you're talking about a bootable drive not a data drive, and that your master is already set up. You may find this generally helpful: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Hard-Disk-Upgrade/index.html This is x86-specific in a few places: LILO vs SILO, partitioning. The howto says you can copy data between drives at 10 megabytes/minute. With new ultra/wide >=7200 RPM drives expect a rate in megabytes per second, probably well over 10 MB/sec. > I don't mind physically moving drives from one > box to another temporarily. That's what I've done on several platforms. I use the cp -ax method to copy. I couldn't find an online example of making the destination drive bootable with SILO. I don't quite remember how I did it last time cloning an Ultra Sparc drive. Possibly a chroot environment and some arguments to the silo command to get it to write the bootblock to the new drive instead of the current boot one. > What about a firewire connection? USB? Copying works the same way as if you install the drive internally or in an external SCSI box. Speeds vary, especially with USB1 which is barely 1 megabyte/sec. > Is it easier just to build the clone from scratch instead of cloning a > drive? That heavily depends on how complex your installation is already on the master. And did you document every install and config step on the master precisely? If you have a lot of manual install steps (a couple of dozen apps for example, or many non-default debconf settings) and you want to exactly duplicate them on the three replicas, drive cloning is the best way to ensure consistency. If you had do do manual post-install tweaking to get the master to work properly, then cloning is vital to eliminate having to repeat the tweaking. If your master is a barebones install with few manual steps after partitioning and mkfs, then you could simply set up the three replica Blades next to one another and run the installs in parallel, following the precise docs of the master install. Cloning will cost more clock time than parallel installs - you're powering down and rebooting the machine once per clone drive. Even worse if you do badblock scans on large drives. You can do the badblock scans in parallel in their home machines then interrupt the installs and switch to drive cloning. Thought experiment: Hook all four drives up to one machine at the same time over SCSI, and clone in parallel, three for the price of one. I assume a Blade is Ultra2 or faster SCSI so the box could be mkfs-ing and cp-ing to all three destination drives in parallel without saturating the SCSI bus. Lag the cp's a little from one another so only the first cp of a file has to read from the master drive and the other two read from the RAM disk cache. -- good luck, SP
