On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:56:06 -0800
Eric Brower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> DaveM-- I'll float you a sysctl 
> patch for sparc64 and sparc if you'd consider it and find the current 
> "protection" valuable, otherwise perhaps machine_power_off should 
> actually power-off, machine_halt should halt and userspace commands 
> should get smarter about whether they ask the system to halt or 
> power-off.

Ok, I'll check it out.

Reply via email to