On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 09:15:52AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 06:02:00PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > You have to support that ones caused by your patches :) > > > > You can't expect me to field bug reports caused by patches that I didn't > > create. Users can surely expect you to field bugs caused by the patches > > you allow into your package though. > > Well unless there is some way for me to determine that there aren't > patches in your source package that are needed on top of the upstream > kernel source, then I can't support your architecture.
THe only patches I put it are related to supporting newer hardware. Things that are probably in 2.4.25-preX I pull so that we can support things like cheetah, III/III+ etc. There's nothing there that is needed in order to compile or use the kernels. > I can't support any architecture that don't build out-of-the-box > with the upstream source. It always has, and always will. THat has never changed. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
