On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:31:53AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:57:25 -0400 > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That makes sense then. I'm only suggesting for fftw3 to disable the > > -mcpu flag because 1) it's correct, and 2) it would get them past the > > build failure. Fixing the binutils bug is a seperate issue. > > I completely agree. >
could someone try to rebuild fftw3 3.0.1-9 on sparc (the one without the architecture flag) ? i would like to make sure it can be built when using the problematic binutils before uploading a new version. so at the end, what should be the right architecture string to use ? thanks for your help, piem
