On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:51:45PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > BTW, if we move to glibc 2.4 series in future, at that time we may > need to drop LT support. It means the traditional pre sparcv9 system > will be also dropped. Is that acceptable direction for sparc users? > (Note that dropping LT is not decided and I think we shouldn't do so > currently).
I think m68k has no nptl either, and as m68k are a very vocal minority you'll have more flames about that ;-) Let's try to get NPTL working on 2.3 with all supported architectures first, that's been long overdue - long term dropping LT is the only choice, but that'll need a lot more flamewars first unfortunately. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
