From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:25:07 +0200

> Indeed they are. Does the patch assume that cpus are numbered in a
> row ?

Yes, and that assumption is incorrect.

> Now, I reverted the patch for ip_tables.c, ip6_tables.c and ebtables.c.
> Everything is working ok (11h uptime).

Right.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to