2007/4/16, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Maybe your problem is as simple as mine - the physical layout of those cards doesn't match the numbering of the devices? I've got four, and IIRC eth2 is the first one :)
It really worked. I was complicating things. Since Solaris was naming it as bg0, I assumed from the beginning that I was configuring the right interface. I'm now using eth2 for the first physical interface and eth3 for the second. I still don't now why it's named this way. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
