On the subject, if anyone can add anything to this page, it would be helpful to sparc (32 bit only) users.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparc32_linux_distributions Cheers, Chris. On 21/08/07, Chris Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > It seems that people are very keen to see 32 bit support die. Who do > I have to contact to get a separate 32 bit sparc port set-up? As > suggested before, we can give the new port 6 months, and see what > happens? At the moment, 32 bit future is not looking good, at least > let's go out trying! > > Thanks, > > Chris. > > On 21/08/07, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:39:16AM +0100, Martin wrote: > > > As far as I know nothing has happened for precisely the same reason that > > > sparc32 had to be dropped - there isn't anyone to work on the kernel. > > > Without that then a separate port isn't going to get too far, but if > > > there was some one / some people who were willing to work on it, there > > > wouldn't need to be a separate port... > > > > Actually, there would be unless you add additional CPU emulation to > > Linux. Chris is suggesting the only viable option. > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
