On Monday 08 October 2007 19.57:26 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Oct 8, 2007 at 16:15:48 +0200, Mario Iseli wrote: > > So, who wants to help us? > > > > (I CCed [EMAIL PROTECTED], maybe there are some other people who are > > interested in rescuing the sparc32 arch) > > I'm not sure what the point of using a different list for the 1 or 2 > people interested in sparc32 is going to help you. It's not like > debian-sparc is overcrowded.
SPARC32 stuff on [EMAIL PROTECTED] is off topic as soon as sparc32 is
officially dead as an official Debian port. Some Debian SPARC maintainers
may want to keep the list on-topic, i.e. on the Debian SPARC (64bit) port.
Also, this list (tries to) makes it clear that this is not generic sparc
related stuff, but 32 bit specific stuff. I was hoping that those who're
interested in the port could find a sort of focus point instead of getting
lost in other discussions.
But seeing that (me included) talking is everything that's being done so
far, I'm not yet convinced if I had a good idea here. All power to Mario
now :-)
cheers
-- vbi
--
And those meanies used what we said to you and they misconstrued it to
mean what we said, and that's so unfair.
-- SCO lawyers about IBM (paraphrased - groklaw)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
