Hi, sorry for the noise, but if another user runs into this:
[del] >Setting up apt (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... >gpg: key 2D230C5F: no valid user IDs >gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature >gpg: key 6070D3A1: no valid user IDs >gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature >gpg: key ADB11277: no valid user IDs >gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature >gpg: key BBE55AB3: no valid user IDs >gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature >gpg: Total number processed: 4 >gpg: w/o user IDs: 4 >dpkg: error processing apt (--configure): [del] The solution for me was to boot into a 2.6 kernel (even a catatonic one without network support...) and: lian:~# dpkg --configure -a Setting up apt (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... gpg: key 2D230C5F: "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" not changed gpg: key 6070D3A1: "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" not changed gpg: key ADB11277: "Etch Stable Release Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" not changed gpg: key BBE55AB3: "Debian-Volatile Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)" not changed gpg: Total number processed: 4 gpg: unchanged: 4 Setting up aptitude (0.4.4-4) ... Setting up apt-utils (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... Setting up libapt-pkg-dev (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... All was well. I would like to know *why* gpg needs a 2.6 kernel and fails without giving a proper error message, though.... HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Channel 13 Is Haunted (Hex Dispensers) 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Is It Good Or Is It Bad? (Opération S) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
