Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> writes: > Hi all, > > Given nobody answered to the mail from Matthias Klose, the default gcc > on sparc is still the version 4.4, while 4.6 is the default on most > other architectures. > > I haven't noticed any issues with gcc 4.6 on sparc (for example eglibc > builds fine, without testsuite regression), and a lot of generic > regressions from version 4.6.0 (like memory consumption) have been > fixed in 4.6.1. > > I therefore propose to switch the default compiler on sparc to 4.6. Any > comments or opinion? If everybody agree, I'll open a bug about that.
Sounds good to me -- libidn doesn't build on sparc due to a bug in gcj which was fixed for 4.6.x, and libidn is stuck in unstable. It would be great if this build could be re-tried with gcc 4.6.x. http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2011/06/msg00007.html /Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
