Hi sparc (and sparc64, same issue) porters! >Debian buildds dixit: > >> * Source package: mksh >> * Version: 40.2-3 >> * Architecture: sparc >> * State: failed >> * Suite: sid >> * Builder: lebrun.debian.org >> * Build log: >> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=mksh&arch=sparc&ver=40.2-3&stamp=1319590758&file=log
The problem being: >+ gcc -g -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat >-Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -Wall -Wextra -fno-strict-aliasing >-fstack-protector-all -fwrapv -flto=jobserver -std=gnu99 -fPIE -pie >-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -fuse-linker-plugin -o mksh lalloc.o edit.o eval.o >exec.o expr.o funcs.o histrap.o jobs.o lex.o main.o misc.o shf.o syn.o tree.o >var.o strlcpy.o printf.o >edit.o (symbol from plugin): warning: memset used with constant zero length >parameter; this could be due to transposed parameters >`__sparc_get_pc_thunk.l7' referenced in section `.text' of >/tmp/ccwb0C7i.ltrans12.ltrans.o: defined in discarded section >`.text.__sparc_get_pc_thunk.l7.2988[__sparc_get_pc_thunk.l7.2988]' of >/tmp/ccwb0C7i.ltrans12.ltrans.o >`__sparc_get_pc_thunk.l7' referenced in section `.text' of >/tmp/ccwb0C7i.ltrans26.ltrans.o: defined in discarded section >`.text.__sparc_get_pc_thunk.l7.2613[__sparc_get_pc_thunk.l7.2613]' of >/tmp/ccwb0C7i.ltrans26.ltrans.o >collect2: ld returned 1 exit status This looks like a toolchain (binutils?) issue to me, probably from either +pie or +bindnow hardening flags being introduced into the package. I’ve asked doko whether he’s seen something like this already, but maybe one of you’s got an idea too, before I try to investigate this on a porterbox. Now that I see it… might also be a GCC issue, recalling http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625 but that was years ago, and COMDAT support shouldn’t have become missing… anyway if it’s a known issue I’d like to know. Thanks, //mirabilos -- FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much *much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
