> > > No, that is not accurate. The main reason is that there are a number of > issues with the sparc port currently that are not being addressed > because apparently nobody is interested enough in the sparc port to fix > the issues. > > OK, what are the major issues and the bug # assigned to them? I'd like to keep sparc alive, I have working hardware, and I am very knowledgeable in C/C++ and to a lesser extent SPARC assembly.
> > > The debian.org sparc machines do not work reliably with recent kernels. > That is not sustainable. > > That sounds bad. Suppose I have a kernel that I believe will resolve the issue. What is the process to test and verify that it's OK? > Cheers, > Julien >
