Actually both Debian Wheezy and Gentoo seems to be stable atleast for me, not that I'm running anything complex on these LDOMs. Only issue a saw with Wheezy was problems with data corruption with ext4. Seems to be fine with ext3.
On 19 March 2015 at 11:37, BERTRAND Joël <[email protected]> wrote: > Artyom Tarasenko a écrit : > >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:56 AM, BERTRAND Joël >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Knut Petter Ølberg a écrit : >>> >>>> >>>> Really a pitty, as I would really like to continue to run a updated >>>> debian ldom on my T5140 (sorry about offtopic with regards to sparc32). >>>> I guess the problem here wasn't really access to hardware but lack of >>>> manpower to do the porting? >>>> >>> >>> >>> Don't forget that Sun^WOracle does not provide all required >>> informations (and errata due to silicon bugs) to have a stable kernel. On >>> sun4v, only Solaris and maybe OpenBSD run fine. Some efforts are done in >>> NetBSD to support sun4v, but kernel is not ready. Sparc32, UI and U2 >>> specs >>> are public but for UIII, only UIII+/Cu and errata are public (not UIII >>> specs). I never seen any UIV doc. For sun4v, I don't have all required >>> docs >>> to try to fix actual issues. >>> >> >> I thought sun4v is pretty good covered in the OpenSPARC documentation >> (UA2005-current-draft-HP-EXT.pdf and UA2005-current-draft-P-EXT.pdf). >> What is missing? >> > > Errata, and official doc, not draft. There are some strange > bugs^Wfeatures that are undocumented. > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [email protected] > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > > -- Mvh Knut Petter Ølberg
