On 13931 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > That pad says: "As a result of current state, d-ports cannot accept more > ports". If that's still true, it would make sense to postpone dropping > hurd and sparc until this is fixed...
Hurd is already on d-p, so hurd actually has double infrastructure use. And the last "release" they did came from d-p resources, which is another argument not to continue on ftp-master with them. Sparc has sparc64 there, so that would be an addition to it. -- bye, Joerg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
