On 06/23/2016 09:06 PM, Patrick Baggett wrote:
> Just to adopt a devil's advocate approach here: I could also say that it 
> doesn't make sense to compile dateutils for 64-bit since extended address 
> space is no
> use. I think the point is that there are advantages both ways: having a 
> single set of 64-bit packages is a lot easier to maintain, but David Miller 
> is correct
> in saying that a large majority of packages do not benefit from using 64-bit 
> memory model, but all of them pay a "tax", relative to the 32-bit packages in 
> code
> size, cache usage, etc. Obviously, for stuff like `ls`, I could care less if 
> took 250usec longer due to "64-bitness", but if somehow that caused my builds 
> to
> take 5 extra minutes, I might get annoyed.

I am doing the work in Debian and I am going to do it the way Oracle is doing 
it in their reference distribution. Not following the path that a huge company 
is
already paving with lots of paid developers would just be inefficient and 
Debian's release policy requires that a release architecture has decent upstream
support, both in regard of hard- and software.

As I have mentioned before, the work mainly targets modern hardware. We are not 
doing this so that people can install Debian on historic hardware.

> It's interesting to see, because from a maintainer standpoint, what you are 
> arguing makes a lot of sense, and from David's kernel developer standpoint, he
> probably dislikes what he perceives as inefficient usage of the hardware that 
> slows down his workflow.

It's not slowing down anyone's workflow. You are hugely overestimating the gain 
that using 32-bit pointers is bringing.

> I'm also pretty sure that all of the incredible work you two have been doing 
> to iron out SIGBUS, fix drivers, and many other unspeakable violations of C
> standards will translate to better code if there ever is more demand for 
> 32-bit SPARC packages. Like you said, it shouldn't be a problem to build / 
> upload
> (32-bit) sparc packages, and then install them if desired, right?

Debian has dropped "sparc" and it's not going to come back in the foreseeable 
future since upstream is focusing on 64-bit now.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - [email protected]
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - [email protected]
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Reply via email to