From: James Clarke <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:52:45 +0100
> This indeed was the case. The attached patch fixes the problem for me, > generating 0x106ffff2, which gdb can verify is sensible (of course, the > addresses have shifted slightly): Please don't use attachments for patch submissions. Patches must be inline so that they can be commented upon properly using simply email quoting mechanisms. Thank you.
