Hi, On 2023-07-11 14:33, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, 2023-07-11 at 06:17 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > These are going to be fixed upstream soon, the fixes are supposedly > > trivial: > > > > FAIL: elf/tst-rtld-run-static > > FAIL: nptl/tst-cancel24-static > > FAIL: nptl/tst-cancel30 > > > > This test is supposedly a kernel issue: > > > > FAIL: socket/tst-socket-timestamp > > > > And this one allegedly not related to sparc64: > > > > FAIL: stdlib/isomac > > > > So, my suggestion would be to ignore the following tests for now: > > > > FAIL: elf/tst-audit24a > > FAIL: elf/tst-audit24b > > FAIL: elf/tst-audit24c > > FAIL: elf/tst-audit24d > > FAIL: socket/tst-socket-timestamp > > FAIL: stdlib/isomac > > Correction: These two tests should be ignored as well: > > FAIL: elf/tst-rtld-run-static > FAIL: nptl/tst-cancel24-static
Noted. > So, it's only this failure that just got fixed today upstream [1]: > > FAIL: nptl/tst-cancel30 Ok, I see it's also fixed on the 2.37 branch, I'll pull it from there. Cheers Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
