On 2004-01-14 00:21:45 +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:00:46AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Concerning ssh, why isn't TERM passed to the remote side? IMHO, this > > would make sense and would be very useful. This is just the opposite > > of rlogin, which passes TERM, but not DISPLAY! > > Um. It is! Look in ssh.c and session.c for client and server ends > respectively.
Only if a pseudo-tty is allocated (-t option). But in this case, I get a "Connection to ... closed." message at the end of the connection (and possibly other side effects). I could use the -q option too, though. But this is quite annoying if I want to have them by default. There doesn't seem to be an option for TERM to put in the .ssh/config (and the link between LogLevel and the -q option isn't very clear). -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
