Your message dated Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:42:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244919: ssh: man page asks users to refer to non-existant 
Ciphers section
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2004 16:52:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 20 09:52:45 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailhub1.shef.ac.uk [143.167.1.9] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BFyUH-0002LI-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:52:45 -0700
Received: from exim by mailhub1.shef.ac.uk with no_filter (Exim 3.22 #12)
        id 1BFyTm-0004Ov-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:52:14 +0100
Received: from turtle.shef.ac.uk ([143.167.17.44])
        by mailhub1.shef.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #12)
        id 1BFyTm-0004Oq-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:52:14 +0100
Received: from andy by turtle with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BFySZ-0003gW-Hv;
        Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:50:59 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Andrew Beresford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ssh: man page asks users to refer to non-existant Ciphers section
Resent-From: Andrew Beresford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: CiCS - University of Sheffield
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5.6.2 
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:52:20 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:52:14 +0100
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: ssh
Version: 1:3.8p1-3
Severity: normal


The man page for ssh says...

     -c cipher_spec
            Additionally, for protocol version 2 a comma-separated
            list of ciphers can be specified in order of
            preference.  See Ciphers for more information.

However, "Ciphers" does not exist.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages ssh depends on:
ii  adduser                     3.52         Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf                     1.4.22       Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                        1.10.20      Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpam-modules              0.76-19      Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii  libpam-runtime              0.76-19      Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii  libpam0g                    0.76-19      Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libssl0.9.7                 0.9.7d-1     SSL shared libraries
ii  libwrap0                    7.6-ipv6.1-3 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.1-5    compression library - runtime

-- debconf information:
  ssh/insecure_rshd: 
  ssh/ssh2_keys_merged: 
  ssh/user_environment_tell: 
* ssh/forward_warning: 
  ssh/insecure_telnetd: 
  ssh/new_config: true
* ssh/use_old_init_script: true
* ssh/protocol2_only: true
  ssh/encrypted_host_key_but_no_keygen: 
* ssh/run_sshd: true
* ssh/SUID_client: true



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 244919-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2004 19:42:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 20 12:42:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BG191-0001TI-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 12:42:59 -0700
Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
        by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        id 1BG18z-0006rT-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:42:57 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        id 1BG18x-0001aG-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:42:55 +0100
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:42:55 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#244919: ssh: man page asks users to refer to non-existant 
Ciphers section
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 05:52:20PM +0100, Andrew Beresford wrote:
> Package: ssh
> Version: 1:3.8p1-3
> Severity: normal
> 
> 
> The man page for ssh says...
> 
>      -c cipher_spec
>             Additionally, for protocol version 2 a comma-separated
>           list of ciphers can be specified in order of
>           preference.  See Ciphers for more information.
> 
> However, "Ciphers" does not exist.

It definitely does. See ssh_config(5) (referred to under the description
of -o).

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to