Your message dated Sat, 1 May 2004 13:37:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cloned duplicate
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 20:22:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 12:22:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dci.doncaster.on.ca (smtp.istop.com) [66.11.168.194] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1ApCUK-0003Bc-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 12:22:08 -0800
Received: from apocalypse.kuroneko.ca (apocalypse.kuroneko.ca [66.11.160.122])
        by smtp.istop.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id AA80117C915; Fri,  6 Feb 2004 15:20:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nightcrawler (nightcrawler.kuroneko.lan [192.168.0.3])
        by apocalypse.kuroneko.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 8DA0A7C076; Fri,  6 Feb 2004 15:21:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: by nightcrawler (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 707AD5CAFF4; Fri,  6 Feb 2004 15:22:43 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: please include opensc support
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.42
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 15:22:43 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ssh
Version: 1:3.6.1p2-11
Severity: wishlist

I've recently uploaded the opensc package to unstable. It contains
infrastructure for supporting smart cards and usb tokens. OpenSSH can be
compiled with opensc support (see ./configure --help, --with-opensc
switch). It would be great to be able to incorporate the opensc support
into openssh. I'm eager to send you a patch for enable this support, but
I'm not sure how you would like to go about it. If it was enabled in the
current openssh package, I would need to put opensc in standard which
may not be popular (although if smart card usage takes off this move may
make sense). Or would you prefer to have a seperate package (ssh-sc or
something) that is contains the opensc enabled ssh?

Eagerly awaiting your reponse :)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.0
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages ssh depends on:
ii  adduser                     3.51         Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf                     1.4.8        Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                        1.10.18      Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpam-modules              0.76-15      Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii  libpam-runtime              0.76-15      Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii  libpam0g                    0.76-15      Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libssl0.9.7                 0.9.7c-5     SSL shared libraries
ii  libwrap0                    7.6-ipv6.1-3 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.1-3    compression library - runtime

-- debconf information excluded


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 244159-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2004 12:37:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 01 05:37:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BJtkZ-00046Z-00; Sat, 01 May 2004 05:37:47 -0700
Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
        by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        id 1BJtkY-00061I-00; Sat, 01 May 2004 13:37:46 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        id 1BJtkU-000117-00; Sat, 01 May 2004 13:37:42 +0100
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 13:37:42 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cloned duplicate
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

This is a duplicate of #231472 that seems to have been created by some
slightly confused use of 'clone'. Closing.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to