> Is there a reason you couldn't symlink the PAM config file if > necessary?
So you're proposing that we do something like? /etc/pam.d/sshd -> /etc/pam.d/ssh Sure, you could do that, but since the 'ssh' file would no longer be used, there would be no real benefit to doing so, unless I'm missing something. -- Jeff Layton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
