On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 04:41:32PM +1000, Darren Tucker wrote: > OK, here's my opinion: > - I am OK with adding support for libunbound (we already have > compile-time support for an alternate resolver, ldns), however
*blush* Should have looked at 6.0 release notes. I'm going to give 6.0 a try now. > - I am oposed to a new configuration file option because > Portable-specific options increase the maintenance burden in both > directions. See other response but may be moot given 6.0 + ldns. > But first: why doesn't the system resolver support dnssec? Wouldn't the > effort be better spent fixing that instead? Certainly. However, there can be a lengthy delay in accomplishing this for certain operating systems. Again, may be moot given 6.0 + ldns. -- Luca Filipozzi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
