Vincent Renardias scripsit: [..] |> I'm confused -- does this solution obviate the "slink-and-a-half"? | |"slink-and-a-half" would require more work (kernel-2.2 based, etc...) |2.1r4 will just be a standard stable update that also include a few y2k |fixes.
Excuse my ignorance but isn't stable + proposed-updates Y2K compliant? According to the pretty pages on Y2K on www.debian.org I have no packages of dubious status except CVS (and I can live with that). Incidentally, having seen the RedHat Y2K effort I am particularly pleased to be able to say that the Debian ones are much more informative (and, in my opinion, honest). Arrigo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
