Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 08:47:09PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > That would be perfectly fine by me. Or, alternatively, some form of > > "dire warning" explaining that unless the installer really does have a > > particular special reason for this case, they should have a password. > > Maybe force them to type "yes, I really do want a passwordless > > account" or something. :) > > how about marking all networking utilities for removal, and setting > all firewalling policies to DENY. ;-)
Once again, nope. Is it that hard to think of isolated environments here? It's not the fact of the network that matters: it's a social question that simply cannot be "automatically detected".
