Paul L. Rogers wrote: > I don't know if this is the right place to discuss this, but I encountered > the same problem as described in Debian Bug report #143262 > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=143262&repeatmerged=yes). > > I believe that it would reflect poorly on the Debian project for a package > to be released that is broken in such a fundamental way as part of a > stable release. > > Should consideration be given to changing the severity of this bug from > important to grave? > > Another possibility would be to consider releasing sox_12.17.2-1 (rec does > work for me in this version) for woody instead of sox_12.17.3-3.
Ok, I've seen the bug. IMHO, this bug is important enough to do a new upload but not grave enough to remove sox from the archive. Is the maintainer around? BTW: If this is not fixed, you can still use brec, from the `bplay' package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
